Blockchain — Trust Infrastructure for Verifiable Devices
Articles on L1 settlement, EVM compatibility, EIP-712 proofs, IPFS/Glacier, and ESPR/DPP mapping.
Blockchain for Circular Commerce: What Actually Matters
This category covers how to design a verifiable data plane for device lifecycles using open, widely supported primitives:
- EVM compatibility for maximum interoperability: Solidity contracts, standard wallets, RPC tooling, and exchangeable libraries—no bespoke SDK lock-in.
- Final settlement on L1 when records must survive governance or vendor churn; no need to use rollups/L2 for throughput and cost, anchor truth where it’s durable.
- EIP-712 typed-data signatures to make human-/machine-verifiable attestations (manufacture, test, wipe, repair, resale) unambiguous.
- Content-addressed storage (IPFS + cold archive) so evidence (reports, images, certificates) remains integrity-verifiable regardless of hosting.
- Event-first schemas that keep proofs composable across ERPs, service centers, marketplaces, and auditors.
Expect practical patterns: how to model lifecycle events, when to batch vs settle, mapping on-chain pointers to off-chain artifacts, and how to keep fees, latency, and verification UX inside real-world limits (retail counters, RMA flows, customs checks).
Goal: infrastructure that multiple parties can rely on without trusting each other—and that regulators can audit without vendor mediation.
See Also
- Device Traceability — Provenance and service-history data that rely on blockchain verification.
- Digital Product Passport — EU compliance frameworks using verifiable lifecycle data.
- Circular Economy — ESG and policy context for applying trust infrastructure to sustainability goals.
- Recommerce & Refurbishment — Circular business models leveraging verified device data.